Comments on: AMD Says AI Is The Number One Priority Right Now

By: guest12

guest12 — Tue, 14 Nov 2023 22:28:23 +0000

amd can stick ai where the sun don’t shine it is because of all of this ai crap that is messing up our pc’s and microsoft and intel and amd don’t care they are setting up Terminator it had to have the input and then it made it look like a virus so that the people would turn it on and have the info and good bye world But microsoft and apple and amd and asus and intel have lost their minds they know how that ai is a a clear danger but they don’t care for you being safe and to keep the wolrd safe all so all they can see is money so they have let ai mess up pc’s a cross the world and don’t care al is taking over and these companys don’t see it at all this is very bad for us the people

By: Alex

Alex — Fri, 26 May 2023 07:15:58 +0000

In reply to Timothy Prickett Morgan. and through Xilinx;)

By: M

Thu, 11 May 2023 18:13:53 +0000

In reply to Younes. Threads are not cores. Threads are just a hardware mechanism to share a core. When you have high throughput workloads and high utilization, they don't really help that much.

By: Timothy Prickett Morgan

Timothy Prickett Morgan — Sun, 07 May 2023 14:46:34 +0000

In reply to OGeneral. AMD had to go through HPC to get there. Without those exascale HPC wins and the cred it gave them, they would not have been a trusted option for AI.

By: OGeneral

OGeneral — Sun, 07 May 2023 13:16:30 +0000

Number 1 priority? It should have been their #1 priority five years ago. They lost so much time on nVidia that I can’t see them ever catching up at all. Even Intel got the memo earlier than AMD and by all means Intel is not a fast moving ship.

By: Timothy Prickett Morgan

Timothy Prickett Morgan — Thu, 04 May 2023 17:25:54 +0000

In reply to Parker. I understand. But my attitude is, if the money got spent, then it ain't really there. I judge by the net income and look at the larger picture. Xilinx is paying off, but it had a cost.

By: HuMo

HuMo — Thu, 04 May 2023 16:22:33 +0000

From ancient I-Ching, to modern AI-Ching, for hefty Ka-Ching! … Wing Chun or barraCUDA … may all Schools of valorous PhDs emerge victorious from this riveting contest! In the end, the only question that really matters is: Is Victor Peng really Ip Man, while NVIDIA is Shaolin, or is it the other way around (or neither, or both, …)? (eh-eh-eh!)

By: Parker

Parker — Thu, 04 May 2023 16:13:04 +0000

Just a suggestion, but the first chart with “net income” reflects GAAP data, their net including non-cash (IP, goodwill, etc.) write offs from purchasing Xilinx & Pensando, and stock incentives. It would be more realistic if you’re interested in showing the real money/cash they are making to show their non-GAAP net income that only includes actual money outlays.

By: Paul Berry

Paul Berry — Thu, 04 May 2023 12:47:02 +0000

There may also be a bit of regression to the mean going on here. Not so much that AMD didn’t sell enough this quarter, as much as they sold a whole heck of a lot a year ago.

By: Younes

Younes — Thu, 04 May 2023 01:44:05 +0000

“(Intel will have a slight advantage in cores, at 144 for Sierra Forest compared to 128 for Bergamo, the first time in a long time that this has happened.)”
The above statement is not very accurate, Bergamo has more threads than Sierra Forest (256T vs 144T): Bergamo Zen4c cores are dual threads while the Sierra Forest E-Cores are mono-thread.